Mass Formation Psychosis is yet another marketing construct

I look at the THEORY of "mass formation psychosis" which could simply be stated as "mass psychosis" (adding in the word "formation" is unnecessary except for marketing by creating a new identity for book sales) as a manipulation of the public just like the theory is supposed to blame those who created the "psychosis". It's tending to blame the people that get caught up in the delusions rather than blaming those who are the hustlers. This can be purposely set up this way to keep the frauds going by blaming "the herd" thus making it seem harder to resolve the problems with the governing bodies and medi sin's hustlers being the problem. I noticed this idea of "mass formation psychosis" first pointed out about the man with a doctorate degree Robert Malone, one of those "freedom fighters" that appeared everywhere in that movement against the experimental medi sin, who's career was well paid by the pharmaceutical portfolio system using that term "mass formation psychosis" which like the term "covid" was not well known and thus stimulates intrigue and he was blaming the public. He continued to press forward the lie that any novel fiction virus was absolutely proven to exist, yet many new personalities including Dr. Stefan Lanka who proved in German court no virus exists, appeared explaining that viruses have NEVER been proven to exist thus all the science in virology is junk science. Malone would not accept any criticism for that, and rather continued to blame other things as the alleged cause of people falling into the trap so to speak, marketing his version of "mass formation psychosis" which begs question who first came up with this term. Calling it "psychosis" is not fair nor close to accurate, it's a problem of brainwashing, and insistence, using slick marketing and using deeply embedded beliefs already there throughout an individual's entire life and thus the public at large in particular this BELIEF that viruses are real and not dangerous unicorns. The problem lies with these fundamental beliefs and a set of ORDERS given by governments and corporate interests wielding it's power and massive sums of money. It all comes from those who know how to manipulate for profit. There is no real psychosis so I reject that premise. It's no different than many other frenzys like the frenzy in the 1970's where everyone had to have a Spirograph and they were impossible to find that Christmas to give as gifts. There was no psychosis, there was a frenzy, a movement based on beliefs and interest in something that people then feel they gotta have. This could be based on fun, jumping on bandwagons for social exercise and pleasure, or trying to be saviors of life and environment but none of it is psychosis in my view so I think it's more helpful to keep that in mind along the way with trying to understand what is going on around us with these matters. The only part where there may be a psychosis is when it becomes a cult which the green energy movement does have it's flavor, insisting there are carbon blankets in the sky that trap heat when it's so simple to prove this lunacy incorrect by exhaling on an open doorway that's letting in frigid cold into the house and seeing how well that insulates with all that CO2 blanketing the opening. Those who just cannot understand after seeing that experiment fail are psychotic but again, it's not helpful to blame the movement of government controls by labeling a "mass formation psychosis" it's only fair to blame the cult leaders. In the example of Dr. Robert Malone using that term, he is one of those cult leaders as he insists viruses are real, absolutely proven real, and no such proof exists. Even 220 institutions (and counting) acting as official voices now admit in writing by FOIA responses they have no evidence any virus is real.